Assume that you have just learned of an allegation of horrific child abuse directed at a member of your staff. How certain are you that your records will clearly show that everything reasonably possible was done to ensure that such an event would not occur? Does your comfort level change if the individual was a volunteer instead of paid staff? The hard realities of life are that such misbehavior by any member of your staff, paid or volunteer, can ruin your Y’s reputation and devastate its finances, and those concerns do not address the possibly irreparable harm done to the affected child or children.
Probably the best way to prevent child abuse is to prevent predators from having access to children. In the staff selection environment this can be done through a combination of applications, references, background investigations, behavioral contracts, and interviews. Separate but integrally connected is mandated training. Before addressing the how of the process, perhaps a few words about the why and the who would be helpful. The why is probably obvious – it is better to ensure that children in our care are not abused than to leave it to chance. If we are going to serve children it is incumbent on us to keep them safe – from accidental physical harm certainly, but even more from the horrors of physical, emotional/mental, or sexual abuse.
The who are two-fold: those we need to protect and those from whom protection is needed. We need to protect every child who enters any program or facility of ours from time of arrival until time of release into the control of a designated parent or guardian. (We also have a duty to keep them safe from other abusive or potentially abusive situations if we see signs of abuse, but that is not part of employee and volunteer screening and selection.)
Those from whom the children need protection include everyone who is in or around our facility or programs, but that is broader than the scope of this discussion which will ignore members and guests of the Y, vendors, other children, and by- standers (of off-site programs) and concentrate on volunteers and staff. Who in that subgroup might potentially abuse children? Any of them! Obviously those who work directly with the kids are potential threats, but anyone who has access to the building can approach them. Those in custodial or maintenance roles may be invisible to other adults but the children not only recognize them, they generally know most of them by name. The process should address every paid staff person, every child-serving volunteer, and every other volunteer (program or policy) whose duties have them in the facility (i.e., using an office, leading a class, etc.).
Written applications should be required of every person applying to work or volunteer at the YMCA, especially those referred by the courts for public service. Those who will work directly with children should fill out a supplemental application, and some states require the use of specific forms for licensed childcare workers. While use of the same application for volunteers and employees is not necessary, the two applications should be fundamentally similar. A resume is not a satisfactory substitute. It can be used to augment your application, but since it tells you what the applicant wants you to know instead of what you wish to learn, it should never replace your application.
An application should …
Every employee/volunteer should have a completed, signed application in their file. Oversights or instances where an individual’s date of hire predated procedural changes should not be ignored…an application should be completed as soon as its omission is noted.
Behavioral contracts are an important tool in the effort to keep children safe. Many associations use the Y-USA Abuse Prevention Code of Conduct (or some modification) as the standard of behavior for all who work with or around children, and some use it for all staff and volunteers.
Things to consider when using behavioral contracts…
A signed copy of whatever behavioral contract your association utilizes should be in every employee and volunteer file. It is best if a new document is signed every year. This can be done as part of each person’s annual review, or can be a group effort timed with the start of school, the start of a new year, or any other convenient trigger. The reminder is good for the staff; the Y maintains current documentation, and additional sections and changes to policy (e.g., internet use policy or blog policy) can be easily added if so desired. (See also Electronic Communication Policy and Blog and Personal Webpage Guidelines).
References are an important part of the screening and selection process. They provide a view of the applicant that is not available through the written application or personal interview. Some applicants will provide letters of reference. While these are great supplemental data, like a resume they show you only what someone else wants you to see, not necessarily what you want to learn. Use them only in conjunction with (but not in place of) your normal telephone or written reference checking protocols. References should:
Every employee or volunteer should have two or three reference checks documented in their personnel or volunteer file. The only exceptions might be for those who were employed before your protocols changed – if someone has been an employee/volunteer for many years, you have become their reference. However, a note to the file in those cases would be prudent.
The basic types of background investigation used by YMCAs are criminal background checks (CBCs) and motor vehicle records (MVRs). Some positions may require a credit check (and technically the Social Security address trace discussed below falls into the credit check category). CBCs provide a picture of a person’s past social behavior, important in making decisions about who will work with and around children. MVRs give a similar view of past vehicular behavior, needful for any informed decision about individuals who may drive on association business, whether that driving is to be done in YMCA vehicles or their own.
Some Ys complain about the cost and inconvenience of performing CBCs on so many individuals – however, if we cannot afford to ensure the safety of the children we seek to serve then perhaps they would be better served by those who can or will ensure their safety.
Other Ys question the wisdom of insulting volunteers by requiring CBCs of them; after all, volunteers are the life-blood of the YMCA. However, any volunteer who has the children at heart understands the necessity of ensuring their safety and will not be offended by a CBC…those who are knowledgeable probably would be concerned by the lack of one.
CBCs can vary significantly in their detail and scope. Some report only felonious behavior, others document all criminal activity; some report findings from a limited jurisdiction (e.g., a county or a state), others search nationwide; some are performed by governmental agencies (whose use may be mandated by licensed childcare programs), others are internet-based for-profit operations; some can take literally months for results, others are nearly instantaneous. Assuming you have options (some licensed childcare statutes mandate the source and method of inquiry) here are some things to consider when ordering CBCs…
In the event of an incident involving an employee or volunteer, verification of what was done to ensure the safety of children should be readily accessible. The best place for such information is usually the personnel or volunteer file that is kept at the association offices.
File documentation may not be simple or easy…
The hard truth about CBCs is that they are fallible; a clear CBC is not a 100% guarantee that the person has no criminal record and the lack of a criminal record is no guarantee that the person is not a sexual predator. That said they are still a necessary tool – one that most jurisdictions mandate for licensed childcare. While this tool may not identify every predator who seeks access to the children we serve (about 93% of predators do not have criminal records), failure to use it will be almost certainly considered negligent behavior by the courts.
Documentation of motor vehicle experience is very important for every employee or volunteer who drives an association vehicle or who drives a personal vehicle on YMCA business. Many associations have their insurance agent/broker/company run the MVRs for them and let that person/entity determine driver acceptability. While it is perfectly acceptable to have your broker obtain the MVR (assuming that it is legal in your jurisdiction), it is unwise to allow them to make all decisions of driver acceptability. An association should never delegate safety of a critical exposure or activity to an outside entity. Thus, a copy of the MVR document should be maintained at the Y no matter how it was obtained (direct from the state, through an outside vendor, via the broker, or from the individual), and the decision regarding driver acceptability should be made by the YMCA. It is normal for a Y to set their policy based on what is acceptable by their insurance carrier, but the Y needs to make the decisions, not the insurance company.
Every employee and every volunteer should have a CBC in their personnel/volunteer file. Many associations require repeat CBCs every few years, some require them annually. Similarly, every employee and volunteer who drives a personal or an association leased or owned vehicle on association business should have (preferably annually) an MVR in their personnel or volunteer file along with a statement that the indicated driving history meets association standards. An employee who was hired prior to implementation of the CBC or MVR policy should still have the necessary document(s) in file – every means without exception.
Whether each chosen applicant receives a single interview, a battery of interviews, a group interview, or a combination of methods, face-to-face interaction is critical in the evaluation and screening process. Properly done it is the most costly part of the process because of the employee time and effort involved. It is not a good primary screening method and probably should be the last portion of the procedure. Only those whom you believe are qualified and will fit into your association should be offered interviews.
It is important that there be a set protocol…
From the interview and assessment process a new employee/volunteer is selected, or a decision is made to re-interview one or more, or the decision is made to restart the entire process because no satisfactory applicant was identified. The interview process takes thought, prior preparation, and practice. It requires consistency and order, yet is more art than science. Experience reduces the time and effort and increases the productivity, but the results are never guaranteed.
Training is technically not part of the selection and screening process and so it will not be addressed in detail here. However, it is a vital part of ensuring the children’s safety. All employees and staff who serve children should receive abuse prevention training before they begin work with children. Best practices include its completion each year by all paid staff and program volunteers. Not all abuse is intentional and we owe it to the children in our charge to ensure that those who oversee them are fully prepared to care for them safely.
Keeping kids safe is an enormous task – proper hiring practices are only a part of the process, but they are a crucially important part – cutting corners endangers kids.